- Language
- 🇺🇸
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2023
- Messages
- 200
- Reaction score
- 67
- Points
- 28
I am wondering if anyone has any input on the profitability of short acting drugs vs long acting.
Best example is cocaine vs meth.
Short acting drugs have to be used more often, and are more convenient, but also seem a bit more expensive, at least for cocaine.
Long acting drugs like meth tend to be cheaper, but there is likely a bigger market for them, as people want cheap drugs that work well.
I'm off the opinion that for the best combo of risk to reward, short acting drugs for a high standard and wealthier clients is the best way to go, at least for smaller scale.
What are your thoughts?
Best example is cocaine vs meth.
Short acting drugs have to be used more often, and are more convenient, but also seem a bit more expensive, at least for cocaine.
Long acting drugs like meth tend to be cheaper, but there is likely a bigger market for them, as people want cheap drugs that work well.
I'm off the opinion that for the best combo of risk to reward, short acting drugs for a high standard and wealthier clients is the best way to go, at least for smaller scale.
What are your thoughts?